Incomplete14%Harbor: pendingMultimodalKnowledge & Reasoning

AgMMU

AgMMU is a challenging real‑world benchmark for evaluating and advancing vision-language models (VLMs) in the knowledge‑intensive domain of agriculture.

How to run

ltb · agmmu
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli
$ ltb bench info agmmu

External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.

Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs

Scores

0 sourced entries

No sourced scores recorded yet.

Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.

Reproduced by the community

All runs
Loading community runs…

About

We present AgMMU, a challenging real‑world benchmark for evaluating and advancing vision-language models (VLMs) in the knowledge‑intensive domain of agriculture. Unlike prior datasets that rely on crowdsourced prompts, AgMMU is distilled from 116,231 authentic dialogues between everyday growers and USDA-authorized Cooperative Extension experts. Through a three‑stage pipeline: automated knowledge extraction, QA generation, and human verification, we construct (i) AgMMU, an evaluation set of 746 multiple‑choice questions (MCQs) and 746 open‑ended questions (OEQs), and (ii) AgBase, a development corpus of 57,079 multimodal facts covering five high-stakes agricultural topics: insect identification, species identification, disease categorization, symptom description, and management instruction. AgMMU has three key advantages:

  • Authentic \& Expert‑Verified: All facts, images, and answers originate from real farmer and gardener inquiries answered by credentialed specialists, ensuring high‑fidelity agricultural knowledge.
  • Complete Development Suite: AgMMU uniquely couples a dual‑format evaluation benchmark (MCQ and OEQ) with AgBase, a large‑scale training set, enabling both rigorous assessment and targeted improvement of VLMs.
  • Knowledge‑intensive Challenge: Our tasks demand the synergy of nuanced visual perception and domain expertise, exposing fundamental limitations of current general‑purpose models and charting a path toward robust, application‑ready agricultural AI.

Benchmarking 12 leading VLMs reveals pronounced gaps in fine‑grained perception and factual grounding. Open‑sourced models trail after proprietary ones by a wide margin. Simple fine‑tuning on AgBase boosts open-sourced model performance on challenging OEQs for up to 11.6\% on average, narrowing this gap and also motivating future research to propose better strategies in knowledge extraction and distillation from AgBase. We hope AgMMU stimulates research on domain‑specific knowledge integration and trustworthy decision support in agriculture AI development.