Auto86%Harbor: pendingMultimodalKnowledge & Reasoning

BenchLMM

BenchLMM: Benchmarking Cross-style Visual Capability of Large Multimodal Models

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) such as GPT-4V and LLaVA have shown remarkable capabilities in visual reasoning with common image styles.

How to run

ltb · benchlmm
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli
$ ltb bench info benchlmm

External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.

Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs

Scores

4 sourced entries
HarnessSourceConfidenceLink
GPT-4V58.4N/AIndependentmediumMar 15, 2023arxiv.org
LLaVA-1.5-13B55.5N/AIndependentmediumOct 5, 2023arxiv.org
LLaVA-1.5-7B46.8N/AIndependentmediumApr 17, 2023arxiv.org
LLaVA-1-13B43.5N/AIndependentmediumApr 17, 2023arxiv.org

Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.

Reproduced by the community

All runs
Loading community runs…

About

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) such as GPT-4V and LLaVA have shown remarkable capabilities in visual reasoning with common image styles. However, their robustness against diverse style shifts, crucial for practical applications, remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose a new benchmark, BenchLMM, to assess the robustness of LMMs against three different styles: artistic image style, imaging sensor style, and application style, where each style has five sub-styles. Utilizing BenchLMM, we comprehensively evaluate state-of-the-art LMMs and reveal: 1) LMMs generally suffer performance degradation when working with other styles; 2) An LMM performs better than another model in common style does not guarantee its superior performance in other styles; 3) LMMs' reasoning capability can be enhanced by prompting LMMs to predict the style first, based on which we propose a versatile and training-free method for improving LMMs; 4) An intelligent LMM is expected to interpret the causes of its errors when facing stylistic variations. We hope that our benchmark and analysis can shed new light on developing more intelligent and versatile LMMs.