EnterpriseBench
EnterpriseBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Enterprise-Level Strategic Reasoning and Decision-Making
LLM agents are increasingly expected to support enterprise workflows, where tasks often involve missing information, uncertainty, feedback, and long-term trade-offs.
How to run
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli$ ltb bench info enterprisebench
External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.
Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs
Scores
18 sourced entries| Harness | Source | Confidence | Link | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4.1 | 8.3 | gepa | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| GPT-4.1 | 8.3 | gepa+ace | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| GPT-4.1 | 8.1 | dc | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| DeepSeek-V3 | 8.0 | dc | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| DeepSeek-V3 | 7.7 | ace | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| GPT-4.1 | 7.7 | amem | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| DeepSeek-V3 | 7.6 | gepa | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| DeepSeek-V3 | 7.4 | amem | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| GPT-4.1 | 7.2 | single-agent | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| DeepSeek-V3 | 7.1 | single-agent | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| DeepSeek-V3 | 6.8 | discussion | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| DeepSeek-V3 | 6.8 | reflexion | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| GPT-4.1 | 6.8 | debate | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| GPT-4.1 | 6.7 | discussion | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| GPT-4.1 | 6.6 | reflexion | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| GPT-4.1 | 6.5 | self-refine | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| DeepSeek-V3 | 6.5 | debate | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| DeepSeek-V3 | 6.4 | self-refine | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.
Reproduced by the community
All runsAbout
LLM agents are increasingly expected to support enterprise workflows, where tasks often involve missing information, uncertainty, feedback, and long-term trade-offs. However, existing enterprise and financial benchmarks mainly test static capabilities such as information extraction, numerical calculation, domain knowledge, and financial QA, leaving interactive and long-horizon decision-making underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce EnterpriseBench, a benchmark that evaluates LLM agents across this spectrum, from static question answering to dynamic decision-making. Specifically, EnterpriseBench reorganizes existing enterprise and financial QA datasets into a unified foundational suite annotated by capability and difficulty, and introduces three professional interactive settings: Consulting, based on management-consulting-style business cases for client problem diagnosis through multi-turn information seeking; the Beer Game, adapted from a classic supply-chain management simulation for inventory control under delayed feedback; and Enterprise Digital Twin, a project-based business simulator for workforce, risk, and project planning. Experiments with nine agent methods under four backbone models show that current agents have not yet achieved stable, comprehensive, and cross-task reliability in enterprise scenarios. These results show that EnterpriseBench provides a practical benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in realistic enterprise strategic reasoning and decision-making.