Verified71%Harbor: pendingAgentic / Tool UseKnowledge & Reasoning

EnterpriseBench

EnterpriseBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Enterprise-Level Strategic Reasoning and Decision-Making

LLM agents are increasingly expected to support enterprise workflows, where tasks often involve missing information, uncertainty, feedback, and long-term trade-offs.

How to run

ltb · enterprisebench
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli
$ ltb bench info enterprisebench

External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.

Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs

Scores

18 sourced entries
HarnessSourceConfidenceLink
GPT-4.18.3gepaIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-4.18.3gepa+aceIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-4.18.1dcIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek-V38.0dcIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek-V37.7aceIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-4.17.7amemIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek-V37.6gepaIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek-V37.4amemIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-4.17.2single-agentIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek-V37.1single-agentIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek-V36.8discussionIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek-V36.8reflexionIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-4.16.8debateIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-4.16.7discussionIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-4.16.6reflexionIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-4.16.5self-refineIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek-V36.5debateIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek-V36.4self-refineIndependentmediumSep 29, 2026arxiv.org

Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.

Reproduced by the community

All runs
Loading community runs…

About

LLM agents are increasingly expected to support enterprise workflows, where tasks often involve missing information, uncertainty, feedback, and long-term trade-offs. However, existing enterprise and financial benchmarks mainly test static capabilities such as information extraction, numerical calculation, domain knowledge, and financial QA, leaving interactive and long-horizon decision-making underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce EnterpriseBench, a benchmark that evaluates LLM agents across this spectrum, from static question answering to dynamic decision-making. Specifically, EnterpriseBench reorganizes existing enterprise and financial QA datasets into a unified foundational suite annotated by capability and difficulty, and introduces three professional interactive settings: Consulting, based on management-consulting-style business cases for client problem diagnosis through multi-turn information seeking; the Beer Game, adapted from a classic supply-chain management simulation for inventory control under delayed feedback; and Enterprise Digital Twin, a project-based business simulator for workforce, risk, and project planning. Experiments with nine agent methods under four backbone models show that current agents have not yet achieved stable, comprehensive, and cross-task reliability in enterprise scenarios. These results show that EnterpriseBench provides a practical benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in realistic enterprise strategic reasoning and decision-making.