Incomplete14%Harbor: pendingAgentic / Tool UseInstruction Following

tau-bench

A benchmark where language agents need to interact with simulated users and follow complex rules in realistic domains.

How to run

ltb · tau-bench
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli
$ ltb bench info tau-bench

External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.

Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs

Scores

0 sourced entries

No sourced scores recorded yet.

Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.

Reproduced by the community

All runs
Loading community runs…

About

Existing benchmarks for language agents do not set them up to interact with human users or follow domain-specific rules, both of which are vital to safe and realistic deployment. We propose $\tau$-bench, a benchmark with two domains (retail and airline) emulating dynamic conversations between a user (simulated by language models) and a customer service agent provided with domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines. We employ a efficient and faithful evaluation process that compares the database state at the end of a conversation with the annotated goal state, and propose a new metric (pass^k) to evaluate the reliability of agent behavior over multiple trials. Our experiments show that even state-of-the-art function calling agents (gpt-4o) succeed on $<50\%$ of the tasks, and are terribly inconsistent (pass^8 < 25\% in retail). Our findings point to the need for methods that can improve the ability of agents to act consistently and reliably follow rules.