Video-Index
Harbor: pendingA curated meta-benchmark of 840 verified video understanding items selected from a pool of over half a million across 115 benchmarks, designed to resist shortcut attacks.
- Samples
- 840
- Released
- 2026
- Scores
- 10
Large video language models (LVLMs) have made notable progress in video understanding, spurring the development of corresponding evaluation benchmarks.
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli$ ltb bench info video-levelgauge
External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.
Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs
No sourced scores recorded yet.
Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.
Large video language models (LVLMs) have made notable progress in video understanding, spurring the development of corresponding evaluation benchmarks. However, existing benchmarks generally assess overall performance across entire video sequences, overlooking nuanced behaviors such as contextual positional bias, a critical yet under-explored aspect of LVLM performance. We present Video-LevelGauge, a dedicated benchmark designed to systematically assess positional bias in LVLMs. We employ standardized probes and customized contextual setups, allowing flexible control over context length, probe position, and contextual types to simulate diverse real-world scenarios. In addition, we introduce a comprehensive analysis method that combines statistical measures with bias pattern recognition to characterize bias. Our benchmark comprises 438 manually curated videos spanning multiple types, yielding 1,177 high-quality multiple-choice questions and 120 open-ended questions, validated for their effectiveness in exposing positional bias. Based on these, we evaluate 27 state-of-the-art LVLMs, including both commercial and open-source models. Our findings reveal significant positional biases in many leading open-source models, typically exhibiting head or neighbor-content preferences. In contrast, commercial models such as Gemini 2.5 Pro show impressive, consistent performance across entire video sequences. Further analyses on context variation, context length, model scale, and multi-modal reasoning provide insights for mitigating bias and guiding model enhancement.