Auto86%Harbor: pendingMultimodalKnowledge & Reasoning

EgoExo-Next

EgoExo-Next: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Visual-Option Next-State and Cross-View Reasoning

A visual-option benchmark with 2,503 four-choice questions evaluating dynamic visual-state reasoning, temporal progression, and cross-view correspondence in egocentric and exocentric videos.

How to run

ltb · egoexo-next
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli
$ ltb bench info egoexo-next

External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.

Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs

Scores

13 sourced entries
HarnessSourceConfidenceLink
GPT-660.2N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
Gemini 3.1 Pro43.8N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-5.2-chat43.2N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
Qwen3-VL-235B40.9N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
RoboBrain38.6N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
Qwen3-VL-32B37.0N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
InternVL3.5-38B36.8N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct36.3N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
SpatialMLLM35.6N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
Claude Opus 4.633.6N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
SpatialVLM33.0N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
InternVL3.5-8B-Instruct32.9N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org
LLaVA-OneVision-1.5-8B31.9N/AIndependentmediumOct 3, 2026arxiv.org

Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.

Reproduced by the community

All runs
Loading community runs…

About

EgoExo-Next comprises 2,503 human-curated multiple-choice questions from six public video sources. It features four subtasks: Ego Next-State, Ego-Exo Matching, Exo Next-State, and the composed Ego-to-Exo Next-State.

Scoring uses average accuracy. Evaluations reveal a significant human-model gap, with the best VLM achieving 43.81% accuracy compared to 98.55% for humans, highlighting limitations in dynamic visual-state reasoning.