LingOly
Harbor: pendinghttps://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06196 In this paper, we present the LingOly benchmark, a novel benchmark for advanced reasoning abilities in large language models.
- Samples
- N/A
- Released
- 2024
- Scores
- 10
PECC: Problem Extraction and Coding Challenges
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have showcased their exceptional abilities across various tasks, such as code generation, problem-solving and reasoning.
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli$ ltb bench info pecc
External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.
Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs
| Harness | Source | Confidence | Link | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude 3 Haiku | 27.7 | N/A | Independent | medium | Apr 29, 2024 | arxiv.org |
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | 23.8 | N/A | Independent | medium | Apr 29, 2024 | arxiv.org |
| Mixtral 8x7B | 8.3 | N/A | Independent | medium | Apr 29, 2024 | arxiv.org |
| Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct | 7.2 | N/A | Independent | medium | Apr 29, 2024 | arxiv.org |
| WizardLM-2-7B | 3.7 | N/A | Independent | medium | Apr 29, 2024 | arxiv.org |
| LLama-3 8B | 3.1 | N/A | Independent | medium | Apr 29, 2024 | arxiv.org |
Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have showcased their exceptional abilities across various tasks, such as code generation, problem-solving and reasoning. Existing benchmarks evaluate tasks in isolation, yet the extent to which LLMs can understand prose-style tasks, identify the underlying problems, and then generate appropriate code solutions is still unexplored. Addressing this gap, we introduce PECC, a novel benchmark derived from Advent Of Code (AoC) challenges and Project Euler, including 2396 problems. Unlike conventional benchmarks, PECC requires LLMs to interpret narrative-embedded problems, extract requirements, and generate executable code. A key feature of our dataset is the complexity added by natural language prompting in chat-based evaluations, mirroring real-world instruction ambiguities. Results show varying model performance between narrative and neutral problems, with specific challenges in the Euler math-based subset with GPT-3.5-Turbo passing 50% of the AoC challenges and only 8% on the Euler problems. By probing the limits of LLMs' capabilities, our benchmark provides a framework to monitor and assess the subsequent progress of LLMs as a universal problem solver.