Verified71%Harbor: pendingMultilingualAbstract Reasoning

LingOly

https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06196 In this paper, we present the LingOly benchmark, a novel benchmark for advanced reasoning abilities in large language models.

How to run

ltb · lingoly
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli
$ ltb bench pull lingoly

External harness. pip install lm-eval && lm_eval --model <hf|vllm|openai-chat-completions> --model_args <model args> --tasks lingoly_context (lm-evaluation-harness task family 'lingoly') https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness

License is link-only: ltb bench pull fetches rows from the original host for local evaluation only and does not write a solution/ directory. Do not redistribute the generated tasks.

Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs

Scores

10 sourced entries
HarnessSourceConfidenceLink
Claude Opus28.8N/AIndependentmediumJun 10, 2024arxiv.org
GPT-4o25.1N/AIndependentmediumJun 10, 2024arxiv.org
Gemini 1.5 Pro23.4N/AIndependentmediumJun 10, 2024arxiv.org
GPT-421.5N/AIndependentmediumJun 10, 2024arxiv.org
GPT-3.5 Turbo11.2N/AIndependentmediumJun 10, 2024arxiv.org
Mixtral 8x7B6.4N/AIndependentmediumJun 10, 2024arxiv.org
LLama-3 8B4.9N/AIndependentmediumJun 10, 2024arxiv.org
LLama-3 70B2.9N/AIndependentmediumJun 10, 2024arxiv.org
Gemma 7B2.2N/AIndependentmediumJun 10, 2024arxiv.org
Llama 2 70B1.1N/AIndependentmediumJun 10, 2024arxiv.org

Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.

Reproduced by the community

All runs
Loading community runs…

About

https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06196 In this paper, we present the LingOly benchmark, a novel benchmark for advanced reasoning abilities in large language models. Using challenging Linguistic Olympiad puzzles, we evaluate (i) capabilities for in-context identification and generalisation of linguistic patterns in very low-resource or extinct languages, and (ii) abilities to follow complex task instructions. The LingOly benchmark covers more than 90 mostly low-resource languages, minimising issues of data contamination, and contains 1,133 problems across 6 formats and 5 levels of human difficulty. We assess performance with both direct accuracy and comparison to a no-context baseline to penalise memorisation. Scores from 11 state-of-the-art LLMs demonstrate the benchmark to be challenging, and models perform poorly on the higher difficulty problems. On harder problems, even the top model only achieved 38.7% accuracy, 24.7% improvement over the no-context baseline. Large closed models typically outperform open models, and in general, the higher resource the language, the better the scores. These results indicate, in absence of memorisation, true multi-step out-of-domain reasoning remains a challenge for current language models.

Available in EleutherAI lm-evaluation-harness as task family lingoly (2 tasks).