Auto86%Harbor: pendingMultimodalKnowledge & Reasoning

VisualWorldBench

VisualWorldBench: A Fine-Grained Multi-Task Benchmark for Evaluating Visual World Knowledge in MLLMs

A taxonomy-grounded benchmark with 32,541 instances across 8 domains and 4 tasks (recognition, selection, localization, naming) to evaluate fine-grained visual world knowledge in MLLMs.

How to run

ltb · visualworldbench
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli
$ ltb bench info visualworldbench

External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.

Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs

Scores

13 sourced entries
HarnessSourceConfidenceLink
Gemini 3.1 Pro80.4N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro73.8N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
Kimi K2.562.9N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
Mimo-V2-Omni56.0N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
qwen3.5-27B53.0N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-5.451.2N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-5.2-chat47.8N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
google/gemma-4-31B-it47.4N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
qwen3.5-9B46.6N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct40.8N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it36.5N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
Qwen3.5 4B36.5N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org
Qwen3-VL-4B33.7N/AIndependentmediumOct 14, 2026arxiv.org

Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.

Reproduced by the community

All runs
Loading community runs…

About

VisualWorldBench comprises 32,541 evaluation instances covering 15,479 categories across 8 visual domains, built on a hierarchical taxonomy of 21,291 leaf-node classes. It employs four complementary tasks: closed-set recognition, contrastive selection, precise localization, and open-world naming.

Scoring relies on accuracy across these tasks. Experiments show the strongest closed-source model achieves only 80.4% average accuracy, revealing significant capability gaps in fine-grained entity discrimination compared to conventional benchmarks.