AgenticBBO-Bench
Harbor: pendingA cross-domain benchmark evaluating LLM agents on five black-box optimization tasks (synthetic, HPO, DB tuning, chip design, molecular) under a unified finite-budget protocol.
- Samples
- N/A
- Released
- 2026
- Scores
- 7
EngiWorld: What Can Frontier Agents Deliver in Professional Engineering Environments?
A benchmark evaluating frontier agents on professional engineering tasks across CAD/CAE/CAM/BIM domains using GUI/CLI interfaces with artifact-centric verification.
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli$ ltb bench info engiworld
External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.
Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs
| Harness | Source | Confidence | Link | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 44.3 | N/A | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 38.0 | N/A | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| Qwen3.8 Max | 25.8 | N/A | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 25.5 | N/A | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 25.3 | N/A | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| Kimi K3 | 24.1 | N/A | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
| Qwen3.8 Flash | 16.1 | N/A | Independent | medium | Sep 29, 2026 | arxiv.org |
Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.
Content & Construction: EngiWorld is the first benchmark structured around a complete design loop, featuring 1,301 expert-curated tasks spanning six engineering domains (CAD, CAE, CAM, BIM, EDA, and 3D visualization) across 26 software platforms. It covers GUI and CLI interfaces with task types ranging from software selection to open-ended challenges.
Scoring & Key Findings: The benchmark employs an artifact-centric evaluation methodology using a unified domain-verifier suite that programmatically checks geometric validity, physical feasibility, and rule compliance. Evaluation of seven frontier models reveals a substantial capability gap, where the strongest model achieves an EngiScore of only 44.3.