Auto86%Harbor: pendingCodingAgentic / Tool UseKnowledge & Reasoning

WorldSolver

WorldSolver: Can LLM Agents Simulate the Physical Dynamics via Solver Generation?

A benchmark of 168 tasks evaluating LLM agents' ability to generate physics solvers from descriptions across 7 domains, assessed via execution, visual fidelity, and physical plausibility.

How to run

ltb · worldsolver
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli
$ ltb bench info worldsolver

External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.

Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs

Scores

7 sourced entries
HarnessSourceConfidenceLink
GPT-5.6 Sol48.7N/AIndependentmediumOct 6, 2026arxiv.org
Claude Opus 546.7N/AIndependentmediumOct 6, 2026arxiv.org
Gemini 3.7 Flash29.3N/AIndependentmediumOct 6, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash24.6N/AIndependentmediumOct 6, 2026arxiv.org
GLM-5.323.6N/AIndependentmediumOct 6, 2026arxiv.org
Qwen3.8 Max22.7N/AIndependentmediumOct 6, 2026arxiv.org
Kimi K2.7 Code17.1N/AIndependentmediumOct 6, 2026arxiv.org

Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.

Reproduced by the community

All runs
Loading community runs…

About

WorldSolver comprises 168 simulation tasks derived from 61 classic computer graphics papers, spanning 7 physical domains. Each task provides a phenomenon description and fixed code scaffold, requiring agents to implement the solver logic.

Evaluation combines execution checks, visual fidelity of rendered videos, and physical plausibility of state trajectories. Frontier models like GPT-5.6-Sol achieve only ~48.7%, highlighting the difficulty of agentic solver generation.