Auto86%Harbor: pendingAgentic / Tool UseSafety & Alignment

AgentMonBench

Agent Monitoring Benchmark

A software-engineering benchmark evaluating monitors' ability to identify consequential agent decisions and locate evidence for user oversight across three subsets.

How to run

ltb · agentmonbench
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli
$ ltb bench info agentmonbench

External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.

Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs

Scores

8 sourced entries
HarnessSourceConfidenceLink
GPT-5.6 Sol1.0N/AIndependentmediumOct 5, 2026arxiv.org
GLM-5.31.0N/AIndependentmediumOct 5, 2026arxiv.org
Kimi K31.0N/AIndependentmediumOct 5, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-5.6-terra0.9N/AIndependentmediumOct 5, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash0.8N/AIndependentmediumOct 5, 2026arxiv.org
Claude Sonnet 50.8N/AIndependentmediumOct 5, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-5.6 Luna0.7N/AIndependentmediumOct 5, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek V4 Pro0.5N/AIndependentmediumOct 5, 2026arxiv.org

Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.

Reproduced by the community

All runs
Loading community runs…

About

AgentMonBench comprises three subsets (SpecGAP, SilentSwap, FeedbackTrace) derived from DeNovoSWE and SWE-chat to test alignment with requirements and awareness of autonomous decisions. It evaluates decision identification and evidence localization capabilities of monitoring systems in long-horizon coding tasks.

Scoring focuses on the accuracy of identifying consequential decisions and localizing supporting evidence. Experiments show that the proposed Evidence-Grounded Behavior Graph (EBG) method improves performance over baselines across eight models.