Auto71%Harbor: pendingSafety & AlignmentAgentic / Tool Use

ObligationBench

A benchmark of 240 expert-validated agent trajectories for evaluating guard models' ability to identify unfulfilled safety obligations.

How to run

ltb · obligationbench
$ npm i -g lettokenburn-cli
$ ltb bench info obligationbench

External harness. No Harbor adapter has been generated for this benchmark yet. `ltb bench info` prints the known links.

Runs happen on your machine with your own subscription; only the score summary is pushed. CLI docs

Scores

12 sourced entries
HarnessSourceConfidenceLink
ObligationGuard57.5N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
Claude Opus 4.849.0N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
GPT-5.6 Sol47.8N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek V4 Pro33.6N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash32.1N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
Kimi K331.0N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
GLM-5.330.4N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
Qwen3.8 27B20.9N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
Qwen3.8 Max18.0N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
Qwen3 8B15.3N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
gpt-oss-20b9.7N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct0.6N/AIndependentmediumOct 8, 2026arxiv.org

Every number links to where it was published. Low-confidence rows are muted and need per-cell verification.

Reproduced by the community

All runs
Loading community runs…

About

ObligationBench comprises 240 instances (120 positive, 120 negative) drawn from real software-engineering tasks like issue resolution and terminal operations. It features diverse LLM agents and covers risks such as data exposure and unauthorized access.

Scoring uses recall and exact-match rates against human-annotated ground truth. Existing models struggle significantly, with top recall at 48.97% and exact-match at 10.00%, indicating the benchmark is unsaturated and challenging.